Team progress reviews

04/07/06

Team Simulacrum
Date	Progress	Comments/Risks
2006/04/07	Proposal:QA Plan and Risk Management Plan to be reviewed by team SOW: accepted SRS: not baselined Architectural documents: Architectural drivers. Notional Architecture. Process definition: Operations proposal SPMP: N/A Reflection: Reflection meeting held on 03/06. Next on 04/08. Case study paper:N/A	Performing 10 experiments to refine architecture. Planning for a review with the customers presence for mid-April. Reassessed the plan, and pushed back 6p for summer

Team DaVinci
Date	Progress	Comments/Risks
2005/04/07	High level notional architecture done Software process specification revised Requirement Elicitation: use case, testing criteria Regular Customer meeting	We have many problems among the team, such as: low moral low productivity missing common working hour... Find the root causes?

03/24/06

Team Simulacrum
Date	Progress	Comments/Risks
2006/03/24	Proposal:Design Proposal reviewed; QA Plan and Risk Management Plan in review by mentors SOW: accepted SRS: not baselined Architectural documents: Architectural drivers. Notional Architecture. Process definition: Operations proposal SPMP: N/A Reflection: Reflection meeting held on 03/06. Next on 04/08 Case study paper:N/A	Went through stages 4 and 5 of ACDM. Moving to 6e and 7e when more experiments will be performed. Planning for customer to fly in for architectural review in mid April

Team Serendipity
Date	Progress	Comments/Risks
2006/3/24	Proposal: Will updated this week after the reflection meeting of the second cycle SOW: the updated version hasn’t been signed yet. SRS: Will start the draft this week. Requirements are being refined with the client Architectural documents: Notional architecture is in fifth iteration. Will start evaluation next week Process definition: N/A SPMP: N/A Reflection: carried out a second reflection meeting this week. Case study paper: N/A	- Identified risks and ranked them. Mitigation and tracking will be carried out next week - Working on the long term plan and how to improve status tracking - Communication problems are leading to frustration within the team.

Team DaVinci
Date	Progress	Comments/Risks
2006/03/24	Proposal:Implemenation Proposal done SOW: done SRS: done Architecture documentation: stated Process definition: done SPMP: N/A Reflection: sprint 4 reflection done Case study paper: N/A	finished our MOSP MOSP reflection Working on refining our planning meeting

02/02/2006

Team Simulacrum
Date	Progress	Comments/Risks
2006/02/02	Proposal: Started working on design proposal SOW:Done. SRS: Done. Architectural documents: Not started Process definition: Done. SPMP: Not defined Reflection: Next scheduled for monday Case study paper:N/A	We decided to use the Academic License. We are not experienced witht the requirements refinement process.

Team DaVinci
Date	Progress	Comments/Risks
2006/02/02	Proposal: Development Proposal progressing SRE: SRE session finished	Productivity is not very well Requirement elicitation hasn't been done much yet

02/17/2006

Team Simulacrum
Date	Progress	Comments/Risks
2006/02/17	Proposal: In progress Design SOW: accepted SRS: not baselined Architectural documents: Architectural drivers Process definition: Operations proposal SPMP: N/A Reflection: Reflection meeting held on 02/10 Case study paper:N/A	Acquired Academic License for Opnet; Opnet learning curve is steep;Working on experiments;